Martin Luther King

(2448 words)
  • Peter Ling (University of Nottingham)

If a literary encyclopaedia should confine itself to writers, then Dr. Martin Luther King, Jnr., would be a contentious choice. The problems begin with his doctoral thesis, presented to Boston University in 1954 to fulfil the requirements of King's doctorate in systematic theology. When scholars examined this dissertation closely as part of the massive Martin Luther King Papers project, based at Stanford, they discovered that substantial portions of it were taken from the writings of others without proper citation. In short, the young King was a plagiarist, and his supervisors and examiners had failed to catch and eliminate his tendency to rely on the writings of others.

When this revelation reached the press, a predictable …

Please log in to consult the article in its entirety. If you are a member (student of staff) of a subscribing institution (see List), you should be able to access the LE on campus directly (without the need to log in), and off-campus either via the institutional log in we offer, or via your institution's remote access facilities, or by creating a personal user account with your institutional email address. If you are not a member of a subscribing institution, you will need to purchase a personal subscription. For more information on how to subscribe as an individual user, please see under Individual Subcriptions.

Citation:
Ling, Peter. "Martin Luther King". The Literary Encyclopedia. First published 09 February 2010
[http://www.litencyc.com/php/speople.php?rec=true&UID=5603, accessed 02 August 2015.]


Related Groups

  1. American Civil-Rights Movement in the 1960s