Before the 1937 ruling West Coast Hotel vs. Parrish that upheld a minimum wage for women, the Supreme Court had held the position that the state should not interfere in the liberty of contract between employer and employee. Moreover, it was argued that women, having gained the vote, had achieved a degree of equality that meant they didn't need any special protection under the law, despite women often having little choice other than to accept low paid jobs. Previous rulings had favoured employers, arguing that any state upholding of a minimum wage for women would be unconstitutional. However, when chambermaid Elsie Parrish sued the hotel where she worked for the difference between what she was paid and the state minimum wage, …
The Supreme Court upholds a minimum wage law for women (143 words)
Historical Context Note
Please log in to consult the article in its entirety. If you are a member (student of staff) of a subscribing institution (see List), you should be able to access the LE on campus directly (without the need to log in), and off-campus either via the institutional log in we offer, or via your institution's remote access facilities, or by creating a personal user account with your institutional email address. If you are not a member of a subscribing institution, you will need to purchase a personal subscription. For more information on how to subscribe as an individual user, please see under Individual Subcriptions.
Save this article
If you need to create a new bookshelf to save this article in, please make sure that you are logged in, then go to your 'Account' here.