Theodor W. Adorno stated in 1951 that he considered writing poetry after Auschwitz “barbaric”. Adorno – who later modified his dictum – meant that art cannot show the suffering of the victims commensurately, and that therefore the project of doing so risks turning into an unworthy aestheticisation of the horror, a gleaning of pleasure from pain or an illusory giving of meaning to a catastrophe which was actually meaningless. George Steiner also claimed that art is trivial or impertinent in the face of the Holocaust. Against this we claim that there is a Holocaust literature that goes beyond mimesis. Lawrence Langer argues that artistic treatment of the Holocaust is characterised not by a doomed attempt simply to transpose …
We have have no profile for this entry. If you are a qualified scholar and you wish to write for The Literary Encyclopedia, please click here to contact us.
White, Alfred D.. "German Literature of the Holocaust". The Literary Encyclopedia. First published 12 March 2007
[http://www.litencyc.com/php/stopics.php?rec=true&UID=1718, accessed 27 July 2017.]